NOVELTY DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Leonhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on declarations from DEA officials in determining whether the DEA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in issuing suspension order
• exercising jurisdiction where both parties agreed that the relevant agency action was not a “‘final determination, finding, or conclusion’ under the CSA”
• “The underlying question on the merits is whether DEA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in suspending [the plaintiff’s] registration based on a preliminary finding that its continued operation posed an ‘imminent danger to public health and safety’”
• “The underlying question on the merits is whether DEA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in suspending [the plaintiff’s] registration based on a preliminary finding that its continued operation posed an ‘imminent danger to public health or safety.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).