Novak v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants' \surreptitious videotaping of Plaintiffs engaged in an intimate affair in the sanctity of [one of their] private residence[s] amounts to outrageous conduct that is 'utterly intolerable in a civilized community' \
• finding this element satisfied \because the possible emotional impact of discovering that one has been secretly taped having intercourse in a private residence can be considered 'common knowledge.' \
• “Plaintiffs' ITED claim must meet the pleading standard found in the Federal Rules, rather than the heightened standard required by Virginia state courts.”
• after separated husband hired an agency to conduct surveillance on his wife, an employee entered her property, recorded her having sex with another man inside of her home, and disseminated the video to her estranged husband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).