Skip to main content
· 1/15/1832

Nott v. Kincaid

Citations

  • 3 La. 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing an action in this District because \the entire controversy [could] be decided\ by concurrent litigation in the first-filed forum
  • “The practice of judge-shopping raises serious questions of professional ethics and undermines trust in the court’s impartiality. Some consequence should follow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.