Nott v. Brander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 230(e)(1) is inapplicable to civil actions
• holding § 230(e)(1) is inapplicable to civil actions
• denying motion for reconsideration in part because “[p]laintiffs provide[d] no reason why they could not have presented such arguments in their initial briefing, and such new arguments have no place in a motion for reconsideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).