Noto v. City of Rochester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Viewing the intoxication evidence in the light most favorable to [petitioner], we find that it was insufficient to allow a reasonable person to entertain doubt as to the element of intent”
• petitioner’s sufficiency claim “is unpreserved for appellate review” and “[i]n any event, viewing the evidence in the light most 11 favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish [petitioner’s] guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).