Notman v. Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object to alleged “testimonial hearsay in violation of [appellant’s] Sixth Amendment right to confrontation” because it was a strategic decision
• “[W]e evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.”
• “[A] matter such as the cross-examination of a witness is most often grounded in matters of trial tactics and strategy and, in those instances, provides no basis for finding counsel’s performance deficient.”
• “a matter such as the cross-examination of a witness is most often grounded in matters of trial tactics and strategy and, in those instances, provides no basis for finding counsel’s performance deficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).