Note One Auto Sales and John M. Goss v. Joseph Thomas Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge did not violate Md. Rule 18-102.5 when she performed her judicial duties by appreciating the facts presented, understanding the applicable law, and drawing a reasonable conclusion
• holding that a judge did not violate Md. Rule 18-102.5 when she performed her judicial duties by appreciating the facts presented, understanding the applicable law, and drawing a reasonable conclusion
• aim of judicial disciplinary proceedings is “the maintenance of the honor and dignity of the judiciary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).