Nosse v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is a “well-accepted principle in our jurisprudence that a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a remand order”
• noting that the “rule of mandate” encapsulates “the well- accepted principle in our jurisprudence that a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a remand order”
• discussing the “rule of mandate,” which “embodies the well-accepted principle in our jurisprudence that a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a remand order.”
• “When an appellate court remands a case with specific instructions, it is improper for a lower court to exceed the scope of the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).