Nosonowitz v. Eagle Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth that under the traveling employee doctrine, a traveling employee’s “continuity of employment is not broken unless the employe’s activity constitutes an abandonment of employment.”
• setting forth that under the traveling employee doctrine, a traveling employee’s “continuity of employment is not broken unless the [J-71-2020] - 9 employe’s activity constitutes an abandonment of employment.”
• employee not disqualified from award of compensation for death in car accident which occurred some five hours after his completion of work despite fact that he had spent intervening hours drinking beer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).