Skip to main content
· 11/6/2003

Noske v. Friedberg

Citations

  • 670 N.W.2d 740
  • 2003 Minn. LEXIS 717
  • 2003 WL 22509739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiff must allege “that but for [the attorney’s] conduct the plaintiff would have been successful in the prosecution or defense of the action” (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • date of conviction relief triggers accrual of malpractice action; desirable bright line rule undercut if made contingent on whether State decides to retry
  • reaching merits of argument despite procedural challenges
  • reaching merits of argument despite procedural challenges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.