Nose v. Rementer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the legislative history suggests § 1631 applies only to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leonard L. Bentz v. Sam Recile
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-12-12· cited 40×
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Keith Mcglamery
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-01-23· cited 27×
• Carr v. Town of Dewey Beach
  D. Delaware· 1990-02-02· cited 24×
• Levy v. Pyramid Co. of Ithaca
  N.D. New York· 1988-06-02· cited 21×
• Reed v. Fina Oil & Chemical Co.
  E.D. Texas· 1998-02-24· cited 19×
• Mortensen v. Wheel Horse Products, Inc.
  N.D. New York· 1991-07-25· cited 17×
• McTyre v. Broward General Medical Center
  D. New Jersey· 1990-10-24· cited 11×
• Pijanowski v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  E.D. Michigan· 1986-06-04· cited 6×
• Franco v. Mabe Trucking
  Fifth Circuit· 2021-03-18· cited 2×
• Bechtel v. Robinson
  D. Delaware· 1988-12-15· cited 2×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. McGlamery
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-01-23· cited 1×
• Franco v. Mabe Trucking
  Fifth Circuit· 2021-07-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• Diane C. Martin v. Nelson Stokes T/a Nelson Stokes Garage and Allen R. Lisenby
  Sixth Circuit· 1980-06-19· cited 155×
• United States v. Berkowitz
  Third Circuit· 1964-02-05· cited 121×
• Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1943-01-07· cited 26×
• Rash v. C. & M. Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1966-04-05· cited 5×