Skip to main content

Norwood v. State

Citations

  • 595 S.E.2d 537
  • 265 Ga. App. 862
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 629
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the jury could determine from the tools admitted into evidence whether they were “burglary tools”
  • holding that the jury could determine from the tools admitted into evidence whether they were “burglary tools”
  • holding that the totality of the circumstances permitted the jury to find that the defendant possessed items found in a van in which he was stopped and a truck that accompanied the van and that those items were burglary 15 tools
  • holding that a four-wheeler is a “motor vehicle”
  • holding that a four-wheeler is a \motor vehicle\
  • under OCGA§ 16-8-12 (a) (5) (A), the State does not have to prove value when the subject of the theft is a motor vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Eldridge, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.