Skip to main content
· 6/30/1997

Norwood v. Allstate Insurance

Citations

  • 489 S.E.2d 661
  • 327 S.C. 503
  • 1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court will reform an insurance policy to include UIM coverage up to the insured’s liability coverage when insurer fails to make a meaningful offer of UIM coverage
  • “Allstate’s inclusion of at least three specific options of UIM coverage below Norwood’s liability limits coupled with the plain language of Allstate’s offer form notifying Norwood that she could increase or decrease her UIM coverage satisfied the requirements of section 38-77-160.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Howell, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.