Norwest Bank (Minnesota), N.A. v. Symington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 18 the appellee unfairly obtained a deficiency judgment under Arizona Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 60(b)(3)2 by failing to disclose an unfavorable appraisal and a settlement 20 agreement that included a damages model
• indicating only that the trial court heard oral argument on a Rule 60(c) motion for a Rule 26.1 violation
• finding disclosure failures to be misconduct warranting Rule 60 relief from judgment in same action
• rejecting argument that opponent would have found nondisclosed evidence “if [he] had been diligent”
• applying Civil Rule of Procedure 60, the civil equivalent to Rule 85
• “We therefore hold that a failure to disclose evidence that may be relevant, regardless of whether the disclosure was required by a specific discovery request or by the general duty of Rule 26.1, can constitute misconduct under Rule 60(c)(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).