Skip to main content

Norton v. State

Citations

  • 106 Ind. 163
  • 6 N.E. 126
  • 1886 Ind. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that under the incest statute, if a relative has sexual intercourse with another relative that he knows is related, “he is guilty of incest[,] and [t]his is so ,., whether such intercourse is had by force or without force”
  • explaining that under the incest statute, if a relative has sexual intercourse with another relative that he knows is related, “he is guilty of incest[,] and [t]his is so . . . whether such intercourse is had by force or without force”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.