Norton v. State
Citations
- 104 Wash. 248
- 176 P. 347
- 1918 Wash. LEXIS 1187
Syllabus
<p>Evidence (175-179) —Parol Evidence to Vary Writing — Ambiguity — School Teacher’s Contract. A teacher’s contract allowing excuse from work in tbe summer school without providing the conditions of such excuse, and providing that the conditions of services as heretofore existing will prevail the coming year, is so ambiguous as to admit of parol evidence that it had been the custom to excuse a teacher only upon his or her request.</p> <p>Schools and School Districts (48-50) — Teachers—Contracts— Construction. A teacher’s contract providing that the teacher shall forfeit pay for the two summer months when excused “at his own request” upon two months’ notice to the board, leaves excuse from work optional with the teacher.</p>
Judges: Chadwick, Main, Parker, Tolman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. TilsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-09-07· cited 21×
- Dasher v. BrunoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1955-05-23· cited 6×
- Ethel R. Hurtt v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1962-11-07· cited 4×
- Beyer v. ZindorfWashington Supreme Court· 1921-06-22· cited 4×
- Hurley v. Liberty Lake Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1920-08-13· cited 2×
- Mondal EstatePhiladelphia County Orphans' Court· 1967-03-15· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.