Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2/28/2007
Norton v. State
Citations
- 643 S.E.2d 278
- 283 Ga. App. 790
- 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 652
- 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inevitable discovery doctrine inapplicable due to State’s failure to show that officers had available to them lawful means of investigation that were being actively pursued prior to the illegal conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Ruffin, Phipps
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-01· cited 87×
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1970-09-15· cited 55×
- Callaway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-04-08· cited 41×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-07-26· cited 34×
- Blount v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-12-05· cited 24×
- Travis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-09-05· cited 18×
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-14· cited 16×
- Bundy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-09-08· cited 13×
- Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-03· cited 11×
- Mercer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-09-06· cited 10×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-12· cited 9×
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-07-14· cited 8×
- Steward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.