Skip to main content
· 2/28/1992

Norton v. National Research Foundation

Citations

  • 141 F.R.D. 510
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6026
  • 1992 WL 68351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs’ request for a medical monitoring program to see whether pacemaker wire leads were defective was not secondary to claims for money damages
  • “misrepresentation, materiality of misrepresentation and reliance” are elements of all states’ fraud laws
  • certifying class pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3)
  • certifying class pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lungstrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.