Norton v. Cobb County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Recreational Property Act did not waive sovereign immunity for a county or its employees when there was no explicit language in the Act waiving such immunity, and the trial court erred to the extent that it found there was an implicit waiver of sovereign immunity
• trial court erred in finding implicit waiver of county’s sovereign immunity in the Recreational Property Act, OCGA § 51-3-20 et seq., where there was no explicit language in the Act that waived sovereign immunity
• all three judges concurring in Division 1
• all three judges concurring in Division 1
• physical precedent only in Div. 2-3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).