Skip to main content
· 8/23/1983

Norton v. Blackham

Citations

  • 669 P.2d 857
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statements that \would not be admissible in evidence ... may not be considered on summary judgment under Rule 56(e)\
  • factual issues as to whether a defendant obtained a release by misrepresentation will preclude summary judgement
  • “[Statements in [an] affidavit [that] are largely conclusory ... would not be admissible in evidence and may not be considered on summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.