· 8/23/1983
Norton v. Blackham
Citations
- 669 P.2d 857
- 1983 Utah LEXIS 1144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that statements that \would not be admissible in evidence ... may not be considered on summary judgment under Rule 56(e)\
- factual issues as to whether a defendant obtained a release by misrepresentation will preclude summary judgement
- “[Statements in [an] affidavit [that] are largely conclusory ... would not be admissible in evidence and may not be considered on summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.