Skip to main content
· 3/22/1974

Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. State

Citations

  • 216 N.W.2d 841
  • 299 Minn. 1
  • 4 P.U.R.4th 47
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, to recover, plaintiff must establish “(a) the formation of the contract; (b) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by defendant; and (c) a breach of the contract by defendant” (emphasis added)
  • Not every customer who paid excessive rates pending appeal is entitled to a full or even a partial refund
  • in both cases the Minnesota Supreme Court considered issues raised by notice of review
  • statute does not prohibit authorization of refund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Otis, Peterson, MacLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.