· 3/22/1974
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. State
Citations
- 216 N.W.2d 841
- 299 Minn. 1
- 4 P.U.R.4th 47
- 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, to recover, plaintiff must establish “(a) the formation of the contract; (b) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by defendant; and (c) a breach of the contract by defendant” (emphasis added)
- Not every customer who paid excessive rates pending appeal is entitled to a full or even a partial refund
- in both cases the Minnesota Supreme Court considered issues raised by notice of review
- statute does not prohibit authorization of refund
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Otis, Peterson, MacLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.