NORTHWEST WATER CORPORATION v. Pennetta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether the defendants’ use of the water tank alleged to constitute an absolute nuisance was unreasonable in relation to its location was a fact question for the jury
• substantial interference question must be submitted to jury unless the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom are such that reasonable persons could only reach one conclusion
• loss of view does not by itself make a structure a nuisance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).