Northwest Plaza, LLC v. Northeast Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “because a corporation and its [shareholders] are distinct persons, they may be held liable for conspiring with each other.”
• it was for the jury to say whether defendants were attempting to conceal the material information and whether further inquiry would have revealed the information
• where representatives of corporation signed contract, corporation was charged with having read the contract and understood its terms
• merger clause did not bar fraud claim, where “[t]he 32 representations at issue in this case occurred after the Agreement was signed”
• it was for the jury to say whether defendants were attempting to conceal the material information and whether further inquiry would have revealed the information
• “Issues of justifiable reliance and proper due diligence are generally for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).