Northwest, Inc. v. Ginsberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was pre-empted under the ADA
• holding that “state common-law rules fall comfortably within the language of the ADA pre-emption provision,” because they have “the force and effect of law”
• holding that the applicable state law is determinative of whether or not a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is preempted by Federal law
• holding that the applicable state law is determinative of whether or not a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is preempted by Federal law
• holding that the applicable state law is determinative of whether or not a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is preempted by Federal law
• holding “that the phrase ‘other provision having the force and effect of law’ includes common-law claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).