· 6/15/1994
Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. Norgard
Citations
- 518 N.W.2d 179
- 1994 N.D. LEXIS 135
- 1994 WL 259734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conceding if ambiguity is not resolved by application of rules of contract interpretation ambiguous portion is construed against insurer
- conceding if ambiguity is not resolved by application of rules of contract interpretation ambiguous portion is construed against insurer
- “Determinative is the unique language of this exclusion; the exclusion does not pertain only to the acts of an insured, but also to the acts of ‘an insured’s employee or any other person involved in any capacity in the day care enterprise.... ’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Neumann, Levine, Meschke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.