Skip to main content
· 6/15/1994

Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. Norgard

Citations

  • 518 N.W.2d 179
  • 1994 N.D. LEXIS 135
  • 1994 WL 259734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conceding if ambiguity is not resolved by application of rules of contract interpretation ambiguous portion is construed against insurer
  • conceding if ambiguity is not resolved by application of rules of contract interpretation ambiguous portion is construed against insurer
  • “Determinative is the unique language of this exclusion; the exclusion does not pertain only to the acts of an insured, but also to the acts of ‘an insured’s employee or any other person involved in any capacity in the day care enterprise.... ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Neumann, Levine, Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.