Northwest Ctr. Holdings, L.L.C. v. Simon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Second 2254(e)(1) concerns extrinsic evidence, while Section 2254(d)(2) concerns “situations where petitioner challenges the state court’s findings based entirely on the state record.”
• noting that the voir dire transcript is adequate for conducting a comparative analysis
• noting that the voir dire transcript is adequate for conducting a comparative analysis
• collecting evidence of pretextual reasons to strike two Native American jurors without deciding “whether there was any genuine nonracial reasons for striking each of these jurors,” in order to undercut the prosecutor’s credibility
• reviewing the voir dire transcript and concluding that it “refutes each of the prosecutor’s nonracial grounds, compelling the conclusion that his actual and only reason for striking [a nonwhite juror] was her race”
• reviewing the voir dire transcript and concluding that it “refutes each of the prosecutor’s nonracial grounds, compelling the conclusion that his actual and only reason for striking [a nonwhite juror] was her race”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).