· 8/15/1986
Northrop v. Alexander
Citations
- 642 F. Supp. 324
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The retroactivity of a state change of law is a state question and ‘the federal constitution has no voice upon the subject.’ ”
- “The retroactivity of a state change of law is a state question and ‘the federal constitution has no voice upon the subject.’ ” (quoting Great N. Ry. v. Sunburst Oil & Ref. Co., 287 U.S. 358, 364, 53 S. Ct. 145, 148, 77 L. Ed. 360, 366 (1932)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.