Skip to main content
· 4/10/1992

Northrop Corporation v. Ail Systems, Inc., and Eaton Corporation

Citations

  • 959 F.2d 1424
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 626
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523
  • 1992 WL 71186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no unique federal interest when the federal government is not liable for any damages a military contractor may owe a potential subcontractor for breach of contract
  • finding that federal common law jurisdiction was inapplicable because the application of state law to the interpretation of teaming agreements among defense contractors did not “conflict with a federal policy or interest, or frustrate a specific objective of federal legislation.”
  • finding no unique federal interest when the federal government is not liable for any damages a military contractor may owe a potential subcontractor for breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Wisdom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.