Skip to main content
· 6/13/2000

Northern Telecom Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Defendants-Cross

Citations

  • 215 F.3d 1281
  • 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 13696
  • 2000 WL 763743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecution history statements did not provide a narrowing definition “with reasonable clarity and deliberateness”
  • requiring that prosecution history statements have “reasonable clarity and deliberateness” to narrow claim scope
  • “Claim language is given its ordinary and accustomed meaning except where a different meaning is clearly set forth in the specifica3on or where the accustomed meaning would deprive the claim of clarity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Clevenger, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.