Skip to main content
· 1/11/1909

Northern Pacific Ry. v. Baum

Citations

  • 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 505

Syllabus

<p>ATTACHMENT AND GARNISHMENT — PROCESS.</p> <p>Foreign Corporation Haying no Place of Business as Officer in COUNT! SeBVABLE WITH SUMMONS NOT EXEMPT FROM ATTACHMENT before Justice of the Peace.</p> <p>The provisions of the civil code, relating only to jurisdiction over the person are not applicable to R. S. 6489 (Gen. Code 10253), relating to attachment of goods only; hence, the right of attachment against personal property of a foreign railroad company, having no place of business or officer upon whom summons can be served within the county, is given under R. S. 6489 (Gen. Code 10253), and such a company is not exempted from attachment by the provisions of R. S. 6478 (Gen. Code 10239).</p>

Judges: Giffen, Jiffen, Smith, Swing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.