Skip to main content
· 2/24/1908

NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTH

Citations

  • 208 U.S. 583
  • 52 L. Ed. 630
  • 28 S. Ct. 341
  • 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1470

Syllabus

<p>In cases arising under the contract clause of the Federal Constitution this court determines for itself, irrespective of the decision of the state court, whether a contract exists and whether its obligation has been impaired, and if plaintiff in error substantially sets up a claim of contract with allegations of its impairment by state or municipal legislation, the judgment of the state court is reviewable by this court under § 709, Rev. Stat.</p> <p>Municipal legislation passed under supposed legislative authority from the State is within the prohibition of the Federal Constitution and void if it impairs the obligation of a contract.</p> <p>While an ordinance merely denying liability under an existing contract does not necessarily amount to an impairment of the obligation of that contract within the meaning of the Federal Constitution, where the ordinance requires expenditure of money by one relieved therefrom by a contract, a valid contract claim is impaired and this court has jurisdiction.</p> <p>The right' to exercise the police power is a continuing one that cannot be limited or .contracted away by the State or its municipality, nor can it be destroyed by compromise as it is immaterial upon what consideration the attempted contract is based.</p> <p>The exercise of the police power in the interest of public health and safety is to be maintained unhampered by contracts in private interests, and uncompensated obedience to an ordinance passed in its exercise is not violative of property rights protected by the Federal Constitution; held, that an ordinance of a municipality of that State, valid under the law. of • that State as construed by its highest court, compelling a railroad to repair a viaduct constructed, after the opening of the railroad, by the city in pursuance of a contract relieving the railroad, for a substantial consideration, from- making any repairs thereon for a term of years was not void under the contract, or the due process, clause of the Con

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is not \open to question\ that the Contract Clause applies to municipal legislation
  • stating that it is not “open to question” that the Contract Clause applies to municipal legislation
  • state could not contract away its police power for the purpose of relieving a railroad of its obligation to repair a bridge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.