Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of Grand Forks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding for entry of injunction where record contained “only the statement the benefits exceeded the assessment” and each lot’s assessment was made “without regard to its location, character, present use or adaptability for future use”
• reversing and remanding for entry of injunction where record contained “only the statement the benefits exceeded the assessment” and each lot’s assessment was made “without regard to its location, character, present use or adaptability for future use”
• reversing and remanding for entry of injunction where record contained “only the statement the benefits exceeded the assessment” and each lot’s assessment was made “without regard to its location, character, present use or adaptability for future use”
• reversing and remanding for entry of injunction where record contained “only the statement the benefits exceeded the assessment” and each lot’s assessment was made “without regard to its location, character, present use or adaptability for future use”
• “compliance with the foregoing statutory requirements [Section 40-2307 (N.D.R.C. 1949)] would undoubtedly remove all constitutional objections”
• “compliance with the foregoing statutory requirements [Section 40-2307 (N.D.R.C. 1949)] would undoubtedly remove all constitutional objections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).