Skip to main content
· 3/28/1977

Northern Ohio Bank v. Ket Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 253 N.W.2d 734
  • 74 Mich. App. 286
  • 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there is a defense to a cognovit note when “the particular notes in question and procedure employed in entry of judgment, were so repugnant to due process as to deprive the rendering court of jurisdiction”
  • “A judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction is not subject to collateral attack -3- against the underlying obligation. The underlying obligation has been extinguished and replaced by the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Holbrook, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.