Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Knop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If ambiguity exists by the terms of the easement agreement, the manner in which the parties themselves have construed them is presumptive evidence of their intention.”
• “On the contrary, the possibility of future construction is consistent with the ‘when and as’ language as well as the use of the plural ‘pipelines.’ We conclude the easements permit the construction of Northern’s proposed pipeline additions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).