Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Northern Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 1353
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1162
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 1866
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1489
  • 1992 WL 18478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rights under an insurance contract issued to a predecessor corporation are transferred to the corporate successor despite the existence of a “no assignment” clause in the insurance contract
  • agreeing with Ocean Accident’s analysis that “rationale for honoring ‘no assignment’ clauses vanishes when liability arises from presale activity”
  • agreeing with Ocean Accident 's analysis that \rationale for honoring `no assignment' clauses vanishes when liability arises from presale activity\
  • purchase of substantially all of predecessor's assets transferred insurance coverage to successor by operation of law
  • purchase of substantially all of predecessor’s assets transferred insurance coverage to successor by operation of law
  • a successor’s characteristics are not important because the insurer still covers only “the risk it evaluated when it wrote the policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Norris, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.