Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Ekstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the selection of a truck and use of a truck were not separate activities
• holding that “[w]here multiple causes of injury are alleged, a claim is barred by the automobile exclusion unless it arises from non-automobile related conduct and is independent of any ownership, operation, or use of an automobile”
• defining “arising out of” to mean “originate from,” “grow out of,” or “flow from” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that arising out of is “construed to bar 5 See L.S.S. v. S.A.P., 523 P.3d 1280, 1287 (Colo. App. 2022) (“The elements of a defamation [or libel] claim are: (1) a defamatory statement concerning another; (2) published to a third party; (3
• defining “‘arising out of’ to mean ‘originat[ing] from,’ ‘grow[ing] out of,’ or ‘flow[ing] from’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).