Skip to main content
· 5/28/1987

Northern Indian Housing & Development Council v. United States

Citations

  • 12 Cl. Ct. 417
  • 1987 U.S. Claims LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the district court acts “as a procedural screen to avoid a flood of fruitless petitions invoked contrary to the purpose of § 1292(b)”
  • “Unless all three requirements are met, jurisdiction is not available under the collateral order doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Tidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.