· 6/30/1988
Northern Heel Corp. v. Compo Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 851 F.2d 456
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9066
- 1988 WL 66328
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing application of Cummings factors in determining reasonableness of fees awarded under contractual provision
- affirming award of attorney's fees to prevailing party under contract with nearly identical indemnity language
- finding, where plaintiff brought claim for breach of contract, conditions precedent excused where defendant “deprived [plaintiff] of the 25 opportunity to demonstrate the fulfillment of [those] conditions”
- where repudiation “was but a tool engineered to serve this illicit purpose” of extracting price concessions, there is breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing
- “Where the contract for employment of counsel provides a clear and workable formula for determining the amount of fees, the terms of the agreement will usually control.”
- “The law should not be 1 cannot serve a legitimate penological goal or constitutional interest. See Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F. 2 2d 527, 532 (9th Cir. 1985) (claiming that an action is arbitrary sufficiently alleges the absence of 3 any legitimate correctional goal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Breyer, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.