Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of Berkeley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a city ordinance prohibiting the use of electroshock therapy throughout the city was preempted by state regulations evincing a clear intent to allow it
• holding that a city ordinance prohibiting the use of electroshock therapy throughout the city was preempted by state regulations evincing a clear intent to allow it
• holding that a city ordinance prohibiting the use of electroshock therapy throughout the city was preempted by state regulations evincing a clear intent to allow it
• absolute ban on electroconvulsive therapy violates patient's right to select appropriate means of psychiatric treatment
• absolute ban on electrocon-vulsive therapy violates patient’s right to select appropriate means of psychiatric treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).