Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. 64.111 Acres of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that construction would be delayed unless the pipeline company was granted immediate possession, resulting in irreparable harm because the increased construction costs could not be recovered from defendants
• where parties agreed plaintiff had no statutory authority to immediate possession of the property, court nevertheless found it had equitable power to issue preliminary injunction granting possession even though just compensation had yet to be determined
• where parties agreed plaintiff had no statutory authority to immediate possession of the property, court nevertheless found it had equitable power to issue preliminary injunction granting possession even though just compensation had yet to be determined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).