Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing a predatory pricing scheme as \the deliberate sacrifice of present revenues for the purpose of driving rivals out of the market and then recouping the losses through higher profits earned in the absence of competition\
• proof of unlawful conduct \when coupled with proof of monopoly power ... may satisfy the requirement that the attempt [to monopolize] have a 'dangerous probability of success' \
• implied immunity “must be evaluated in terms of the particular regulatory provision involved, its legislative history, and the administrative authority exercised pursuant to it”
• Act does not expressly authorize FCC to approve protective coupler designs in issue there
• Act does not expressly authorize FCC to approve protective coupler designs in issue there
• \monopoly power is the essence of a Sec. 2 violation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).