Skip to main content
· 2/1/1994

North v. Landmark Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 17 Va. App. 639
  • 440 S.E.2d 156
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 838
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing restrictions on counts that could be prosecuted but not reversing restrictions on numbers of witnesses called to prove particular charges
  • “Certainly a district court has reasonable discretion in appropriate cases to manage its docket by ... disallowing cumulative testimony on a particular charge emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.