Skip to main content
· 9/24/1934

North v. Evans

Citations

  • 1 Cal. App. 2d 64
  • 36 P.2d 133
  • 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It follows, from the premises that defendant has given us, that the possession by the clerk was the possession of the law and that the subsequent execution sales were of no effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.