S.D. New York· 1/12/1989
North Triphammer Development Corp. v. Ithaca Associates
Citations
- 704 F. Supp. 422
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180
- 1989 WL 5203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to dismiss claim for monetary damages, holding that sole remedy clause “does not relieve [defendant] of its liability in the event of willful default”
- finding a cause of action for the malicious filing of a notice of lis pendens first requires a favorable termination of the claim underlying the filing of the notice of lis pendens
- allegation that explicit misrepresentations were made concerning the defendants’ intentions to perform under the contract inadequate to support claim of fraudulent inducement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Crabtree v. Tristar Automotive Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-10-30· cited 39×
- Savitsky v. SukenikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-06-16· cited 35×
- D.S. America (East), Inc. v. Chromagrafx Imaging Systems, Inc.E.D. New York· 1995-01-19· cited 26×
- Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-OA1 ex rel. HSBC Bank, USA, National Association v. DB Structured Products, Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-07-24· cited 18×
- Hudson Optical Corp. v. Cabot Safety Corp.E.D. New York· 1997-07-31· cited 6×
- Gecy v. Somerset Point At Lady's Island Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-30· cited 5×
- Baltic v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-24· cited 3×
- 1111 Myrtle Avenue Group LLC v. Myrtle Property Holdings LLC (In re 1111 Myrtle Avenue Group LLC)S.D. New York· 2017-08-25· cited 2×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- City of New York v. Eastway Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1987-10-19· cited 540×
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1985-05-21· cited 405×
- Francis J. Dwyer v. Edward v. Regan, Individually and as Trustee and Administrative Head of the New York State Employees Retirement SystemSecond Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 243×
- In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-08-07· cited 91×
- Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1956-05-31· cited 75×
- Zev v. MermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-11-30· cited 66×
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Triumph Advertising Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-01-28· cited 54×
- Spellman v. Columbia Manicure Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-05-20· cited 47×
- Chappelle v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1966-11-03· cited 30×
- Ellman v. McCartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-09-10· cited 29×
- Tarlo v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-03-03· cited 26×
- MATTER OF PENINSULA GEN. NURSING HOME v. SugarmanNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-06-08· cited 25×
- Levine v. SarbelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-07-08· cited 21×
- Mazzaferro v. Kings Park Butcher Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-06-09· cited 18×
- United States v. Robert Ray PenlandNinth Circuit· 1970-07-01· cited 17×
- Levine v. SarbelloNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-03-18· cited 17×
- Goldberg v. Manhattan Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 1985-03-28· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.