North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Holty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a term in an insurance contract is not ambiguous unless the language is fairly susceptible to two interpretations
• considering the amount of the premium relative to insurance coverage limits when interpreting an insurance policy
• considering the amount of the premium relative to insurance coverage limits when interpreting an insurance policy
• subsequently distinguished by Kalell, 471 N.W.2d at 866, which explained that in Holty, the motor vehicle exclusion precluded coverage because the auger which caused the injury was an integral part of the motor vehicle, whereas a rope is not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).