Skip to main content
· 12/8/1992

North Shore Sign Co. v. Signature Design Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 604 N.E.2d 1157
  • 237 Ill. App. 3d 782
  • 178 Ill. Dec. 634
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the summary disposition of a sanctions motion “may be appropriate in cases where the pleadings, trial evidence and the factual basis in the record are clear”
  • recognizing that the summary disposition of a sanctions motion “may be appropriate in cases where the pleadings, trial evidence and the factual basis in the record are clear”
  • “we believe the trial court must at least express succinctly the basis for its decision even when it denies a motion for sanctions”
  • the trial court is entitled to deferential review of its ruling on a sanctions motion only if it provides “explicit factual findings” to support its ruling
  • “the predicate to such deference is that the circuit court make explicit factual findings upon which a court of review may make an informed and reasoned decision”
  • \*** we believe the trial court must at least express succinctly the basis for its decision even when it denies a motion for sanctions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geiger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.