North Dakota Supreme Court· 3/16/1995
North Shore, Inc. v. Wakefield
Citations
- 530 N.W.2d 297
- 1995 N.D. LEXIS 52
- 1995 WL 109625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that neither the state nor the riparian owner held absolute interests between high and low water mark
- stating that neither the state nor the riparian owner held absolute interests between high and low water mark
- stating exceptions or reservations in a deed should be so explicit as to leave no room for doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neumann, Vande Walle, Levine, Meschke, Sandstrom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court· 2008-04-29· cited 57×
- Glass v. GoeckelMichigan Supreme Court· 2005-07-29· cited 26×
- Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 20×
- Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-11-25· cited 18×
- Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-04-28· cited 17×
- Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-01-30· cited 17×
- Wishnatsky v. BergquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-29· cited 17×
- James v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-22· cited 16×
- North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-30· cited 16×
- Johnson v. ShieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-08-13· cited 13×
- Carkuff v. BalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 13×
- Webster v. ReganNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-04-27· cited 11×
- Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. FailNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 7×
- Waldock v. Amber Harvest Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-08-30· cited 7×
- Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-11-25· cited 6×
- Hallin v. LyngstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-09-25· cited 5×
- Ash v. MerletteMontana Supreme Court· 2017-12-12· cited 4×
- In Re the Estate of RosenbaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 2×
- Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-09-17· cited 2×
- Estate of Seidel v. SeidelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-01-12· cited 2×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jeems Bayou Fishing & Hunting Club v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1923-01-02· cited 54×
- J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-18· cited 39×
- Kim-Go, H.K. Minerals, Inc. v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 27×
- Royse v. Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children & Adults, Inc. of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-07-27· cited 25×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LaRoqueNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 23×
- Lang v. WonnenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 21×
- Pfliger v. Peavey Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 20×
- West v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 20×
- Mueller v. StangelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-11-22· cited 19×
- Heald v. YumiskoNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-05-10· cited 17×
- Greeman v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1965-11-23· cited 14×
- Brignall v. HannahNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-05-01· cited 14×
- Jennings v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1962-05-04· cited 13×
- Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 11×
- Bissell v. FletcherNebraska Supreme Court· 1886-01-15· cited 10×
- Rutten v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1958-12-31· cited 9×
- Matter of Ownership of Bed of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-18· cited 8×
- Lammers v. NissenSupreme Court· 1879-11-24· cited 6×
Other cases named North Shore, Inc. v. Wakefield
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.