North Shore Gas Company v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting sec. 113(h) limitation on the timing of judicial review ought not extinguish judicial review
• \a probabilistic benefit from winning a suit is enough 'injury in fact' to confer standing in the undemanding Article III sense\
• “a probabilistic benefit from winning a suit is enough ‘injury in fact’ to confer standing in the undemanding Article III sense”
• in some cases, section 9613(h) would do more than affect the \timing\ of judicial review; it would extinguish it
• Seventh Circuit held that the protesting potentially responsible party “must wait till construction of the new slip (part of the remedial action required by the EPA
• “And the purpose of section 113(h) is to prevent litigation from delaying remediation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).