NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[I]n the absence of an impingement upon constitutional rights . . . an act of the legislature is presumed to be constitutional.\
• “Because the trial court properly applied the controlling law as set forth in T.W. and because its findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, we sustain its ruling.”
• “Because the trial court properly applied the controlling law as set forth in T.W. and because its findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, we sustain its ruling.”
• “Under our decision, parent and minor are free to do as they wish in this regard, without government interference.”
• noting strict scrutiny applies to certain fundamental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).