North East Insurance v. Allegretta Motel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a malpractice claim against an auditor could not be made if imputation would impute knowledge of the fraud onto the corporation
• applying standard imputation rules to a claim against an auditor in finding that there was a triable issue of fact
• “[T]he issue [is] whether mismanagement of [the company] was the vehicle by which [the manager] intended to advance his own interest or whether it was simply incidental to his continued efforts to retain some economic viability in the company.”
• “[T]he issue [is] whether mismanagement of [the company] was the vehicle by which [the manager] intended to advance his own interest or whether it was simply incidental to his continued efforts to retain some economic viability in the company.”
• “[T]he issue [is] whether mismanagement of [the 21 company] was the vehicle by which [the manager] intended to advance his own interest or 22 whether it was simply incidental to his continued efforts to retain some economic viability in the -27- 1 company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).